The State of AI Visibility in Singapore Accounting & Corporate Services 2026
When an SME owner asks AI for the best firm to do their books, incorporation, corporate-secretary or audit work, who gets named — and who doesn't? We asked ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude the 12 questions business owners actually ask. Across 48 answers, two digital-first platforms took the majority, the four AIs barely agreed — and because these services are sticky, each recommendation is a multi-year client worth tens of thousands.
- Winner-take-most. Two platforms — Sleek and Osome — were named in 65% and 54% of all answers. No other firm cracked 35%.
- The AIs disagree sharply. Gemini named Sleek in 10 of its 12 answers; ChatGPT in just 3 — and ChatGPT surfaced a completely different cast of firms the others never mentioned.
- Most firms are invisible. More than 60 different firms were named across the study, but around 35 of them appeared just once in 48 answers.
- Each recommendation is an annuity. Accounting, tax and corp-sec clients stay for years. On typical SME fees, one client AI sends you is worth ~S$15,000–50,000 in lifetime revenue — so visibility here pays back many times over.
1. Two platforms own the conversation
We counted how many of the 48 AI answers named each provider. The result is steeply concentrated: two digital-first platforms appear in answer after answer, a small group of established firms cluster behind them, and everyone else fights for scraps.
The pattern is the one AI visibility always produces: the rich get richer. Firms that are already written about — in "best accounting firm in Singapore" listicles, on Reddit, in comparison guides — are the ones AI repeats. The well-marketed digital platforms dominate not because they are necessarily the best fit for any given SME, but because they have flooded exactly the sources the models read.
2. There is no single "best" — it depends which AI you ask
The most striking finding: the four assistants pull from different source worlds, so they surface different firms. Ask ChatGPT and you get a long, local, Google-listings-and-Reddit cast. Ask Gemini and you get the same three or four digital platforms almost every time. A business owner using ChatGPT and one using Gemini are pointed at different doors.
The divergence is dramatic in the data. Sleek's share of voice runs from 25% on ChatGPT to 83% on Gemini; ChatGPT alone named dozens of small local firms that no other engine surfaced even once. For a firm, the lesson is that you cannot optimise for one algorithm. Winning ChatGPT is a Google-Business-Profile-and-reviews game; winning Perplexity is a get-into-the-listicles game; winning Gemini is an established-digital-entity game. AI visibility means showing up across all four.
3. Most of Singapore's firms are invisible to AI
Singapore has more than 1,300 registered public accounting firms and thousands of corporate-services providers. Across 48 answers our study named more than 60 distinct firms — yet roughly 35 of them appeared exactly once, and a long list of capable firms never appeared at all. Below the top ten, a firm only surfaced when a question got specific — "affordable," "for e-commerce," "best reviews," "for foreigners." To AI — and therefore to the owners who now ask AI first — those firms essentially do not exist.
This is the gap that AI visibility work closes. It is not about being the cheapest or the biggest; it is about being legible to the models: a recognised business entity, present in the third-party sources they trust, with structured, answer-ready information about what you do and who you serve.
4. What one AI recommendation is actually worth
Here is what makes this vertical different from almost any other. Accounting, tax, corporate-secretary and audit work is sticky. Switching means re-handover, lost continuity on ACRA and IRAS filings, and rebuilding a trusted relationship — so SME clients stay years, not months. Every client an AI sends you is not a one-off sale; it's an annuity.
The components, on indicative market rates for a small Singapore company:
| Service (bundled for an SME) | Indicative annual fee |
|---|---|
| Corporate secretary | S$300–800 |
| Accounting / bookkeeping | S$1,500–6,000 |
| Tax (ECI + Form C-S/C) | S$500–1,500 |
| Audit (if above the exemption threshold) | S$3,000–8,000 |
| Typical bundle | ~S$3,000–5,000 / yr |
At ~S$3,000–5,000 a year over a 5–10 year relationship, each retained client is worth roughly S$15,000–50,000 in lifetime fees — call it ~S$30k for a typical SME. So the maths of AI visibility is not "did we win a S$3,000 engagement." It's this: if being named by AI wins even one or two extra clients a year, that's ~S$30,000–100,000 of lifetime revenue created annually — dwarfing the cost of the visibility work itself. For sticky professional services, the return multiplier isn't the first-year fee. It's the lifetime value.
That is also why the concentration in Section 1 matters so much here. The handful of firms AI repeatedly names aren't just winning a mention — they're compounding a stream of multi-year, high-retention clients. The invisible majority are quietly forgoing that annuity, one un-named answer at a time.
5. What AI actually trusts
We logged the sources each answer cited. They cluster into five buckets — and notice how little of it is the firm's own website:
- Third-party "best of" listicles & comparison sites — Statrys, bizlist, acrafile, TerrisDigital, Goodfirms and the like. The single biggest driver of which firms appear — and many are written by the firms themselves.
- Community & forums — Reddit threads (r/smeSingapore, r/singaporefi, r/Accounting) from real business owners. ChatGPT leans on these heavily.
- Google reviews & business listings — star ratings, review counts and Google Business Profiles, which surface the wide local long tail.
- Authority & government — ACRA registered-filing-agent status, the CSP Act, IRAS filing rules and audit-exemption thresholds.
- Firm-owned pages — used mostly to confirm pricing and service scope, rarely as the reason for the recommendation itself.
The takeaway is uncomfortable but useful: polishing your homepage barely moves your AI visibility. What moves it is getting named in the third-party sources AI reads — the listicles, the forums, the reviews, a consistent Google Business Profile — and giving the models clean, structured facts to extract about your firm.
What this means if you run a firm
- Audit where you stand first. If you're not in the top ten names above, you're likely in the invisible tail — and you can't fix what you haven't measured.
- Get into the sources, not just onto your site. Listicles, directories, Reddit and earned reviews are what AI repeats — and a complete, consistent Google Business Profile is table stakes.
- Give AI clean facts to quote — structured pages, a recognised business entity, transparent pricing and clear "who we serve" information.
- Don't chase one engine. Reviews and listings win ChatGPT; listicles win Perplexity; established-entity strength wins Gemini and Claude.
- Remember the stakes. Because each named recommendation is a multi-year, ~S$30k client, even a small lift in AI visibility compounds into serious lifetime revenue.
See where AI ranks your firm.
We'll run these exact questions for your firm across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, and send you a one-page snapshot of where you stand against the names above — free, no obligation.
Get your free 5-prompt check →Methodology & limitations
We asked 12 fixed questions an SME owner asks before choosing an accounting, corporate-services or audit firm — spanning category ("best accounting firm in Singapore for small businesses"), need (incorporation, corporate secretary, outsourced bookkeeping, audit), persona (startups, e-commerce, foreign-owned), price ("affordable"), one-stop ("incorporation, accounting and corporate secretary"), decision ("how to choose") and reviews.
Each question was put to four AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude — with web access enabled and a Singapore context, in June 2026. That is 48 answers. (Google AI Overviews were folded into the Gemini result as both run on Google's models.) For each answer we recorded every firm named, the lead recommendation, and the sources cited.
On the dollar figures: the lifetime-value model is illustrative, built from publicly indicative SME fee ranges and typical client tenure — not a quote, a benchmark, or a claim about any specific firm's economics. Your real figures will differ; the point is the multiplier, not a precise number.
Limitations: AI answers are non-deterministic and personalised, so this is a single-run snapshot, not a fixed ranking — figures show direction and concentration, not precise league positions, and will shift over time. "Share of voice" counts whether a firm was named anywhere in an answer. This is an independent observation of what AI said when asked; it is not an endorsement, ranking, or assessment of any firm's quality or service. Firm names are reported only where doing so reflects neutral, aggregate findings.