Free 5-prompt check →
Original research · Singapore

The State of AI Visibility in Singapore Accounting & Corporate Services 2026

When an SME owner asks AI for the best firm to do their books, incorporation, corporate-secretary or audit work, who gets named — and who doesn't? We asked ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude the 12 questions business owners actually ask. Across 48 answers, two digital-first platforms took the majority, the four AIs barely agreed — and because these services are sticky, each recommendation is a multi-year client worth tens of thousands.

The findings in 30 seconds
  • Winner-take-most. Two platforms — Sleek and Osome — were named in 65% and 54% of all answers. No other firm cracked 35%.
  • The AIs disagree sharply. Gemini named Sleek in 10 of its 12 answers; ChatGPT in just 3 — and ChatGPT surfaced a completely different cast of firms the others never mentioned.
  • Most firms are invisible. More than 60 different firms were named across the study, but around 35 of them appeared just once in 48 answers.
  • Each recommendation is an annuity. Accounting, tax and corp-sec clients stay for years. On typical SME fees, one client AI sends you is worth ~S$15,000–50,000 in lifetime revenue — so visibility here pays back many times over.
48
AI answers analysed (12 questions × 4 engines)
60+
different firms named — but 2 took the lion's share
~S$30k
indicative lifetime value of one client an AI recommendation can win

1. Two platforms own the conversation

We counted how many of the 48 AI answers named each provider. The result is steeply concentrated: two digital-first platforms appear in answer after answer, a small group of established firms cluster behind them, and everyone else fights for scraps.

AI Share of Voice — answers naming each firm (of 48)
Sleek
31
Osome
26
3E Accounting
16
Counto
16
Rikvin
11
HeySara
11
BoardRoom
9
Excellence SG
9
BBCIncorp
9
InCorp
9
~50 others
≤8
Digital-first platformEstablished / traditional firmLong tail (each ≤8 of 48)
A firm is counted once per answer it appears in. Sleek and Osome alone account for a disproportionate share of every named slot across the study.

The pattern is the one AI visibility always produces: the rich get richer. Firms that are already written about — in "best accounting firm in Singapore" listicles, on Reddit, in comparison guides — are the ones AI repeats. The well-marketed digital platforms dominate not because they are necessarily the best fit for any given SME, but because they have flooded exactly the sources the models read.

2. There is no single "best" — it depends which AI you ask

The most striking finding: the four assistants pull from different source worlds, so they surface different firms. Ask ChatGPT and you get a long, local, Google-listings-and-Reddit cast. Ask Gemini and you get the same three or four digital platforms almost every time. A business owner using ChatGPT and one using Gemini are pointed at different doors.

ChatGPT
→ HeySara / Margin Wheeler
Pulls from Google Business listings + Reddit, so it surfaces a wide local long tail (AG Singapore, Precursor, CorporateServices.com). Named Sleek in only 3 of 12 answers.
Perplexity
→ Sleek / Margin Wheeler
Leans on third-party "best of" listicles and comparison sites (Statrys, bizlist, acrafile) — often pieces the firms wrote themselves.
Gemini
→ Sleek & Osome
Frames everything in tiers (digital / SME / enterprise) and leans hard on the established digital platforms — named Sleek in 10 of 12 answers.
Claude
→ Sleek / Osome / Counto
Favours the digital-first trio plus full-service names, and tends to flag fit and the audit-exemption rule rather than crown a single winner.

The divergence is dramatic in the data. Sleek's share of voice runs from 25% on ChatGPT to 83% on Gemini; ChatGPT alone named dozens of small local firms that no other engine surfaced even once. For a firm, the lesson is that you cannot optimise for one algorithm. Winning ChatGPT is a Google-Business-Profile-and-reviews game; winning Perplexity is a get-into-the-listicles game; winning Gemini is an established-digital-entity game. AI visibility means showing up across all four.

3. Most of Singapore's firms are invisible to AI

Singapore has more than 1,300 registered public accounting firms and thousands of corporate-services providers. Across 48 answers our study named more than 60 distinct firms — yet roughly 35 of them appeared exactly once, and a long list of capable firms never appeared at all. Below the top ten, a firm only surfaced when a question got specific — "affordable," "for e-commerce," "best reviews," "for foreigners." To AI — and therefore to the owners who now ask AI first — those firms essentially do not exist.

This is the gap that AI visibility work closes. It is not about being the cheapest or the biggest; it is about being legible to the models: a recognised business entity, present in the third-party sources they trust, with structured, answer-ready information about what you do and who you serve.

4. What one AI recommendation is actually worth

Here is what makes this vertical different from almost any other. Accounting, tax, corporate-secretary and audit work is sticky. Switching means re-handover, lost continuity on ACRA and IRAS filings, and rebuilding a trusted relationship — so SME clients stay years, not months. Every client an AI sends you is not a one-off sale; it's an annuity.

The model · Client lifetime value = annual bundle fee × tenure
~S$15k–50k
indicative lifetime revenue from a single SME client on a typical incorporation + accounting + tax + corp-sec bundle — the prize behind one AI recommendation.
~S$3k–5k
typical annual bundle fee per SME client
~5–10 yrs
how long a sticky client typically stays

The components, on indicative market rates for a small Singapore company:

Service (bundled for an SME)Indicative annual fee
Corporate secretaryS$300–800
Accounting / bookkeepingS$1,500–6,000
Tax (ECI + Form C-S/C)S$500–1,500
Audit (if above the exemption threshold)S$3,000–8,000
Typical bundle~S$3,000–5,000 / yr

At ~S$3,000–5,000 a year over a 5–10 year relationship, each retained client is worth roughly S$15,000–50,000 in lifetime fees — call it ~S$30k for a typical SME. So the maths of AI visibility is not "did we win a S$3,000 engagement." It's this: if being named by AI wins even one or two extra clients a year, that's ~S$30,000–100,000 of lifetime revenue created annually — dwarfing the cost of the visibility work itself. For sticky professional services, the return multiplier isn't the first-year fee. It's the lifetime value.

That is also why the concentration in Section 1 matters so much here. The handful of firms AI repeatedly names aren't just winning a mention — they're compounding a stream of multi-year, high-retention clients. The invisible majority are quietly forgoing that annuity, one un-named answer at a time.

5. What AI actually trusts

We logged the sources each answer cited. They cluster into five buckets — and notice how little of it is the firm's own website:

The takeaway is uncomfortable but useful: polishing your homepage barely moves your AI visibility. What moves it is getting named in the third-party sources AI reads — the listicles, the forums, the reviews, a consistent Google Business Profile — and giving the models clean, structured facts to extract about your firm.

What this means if you run a firm

See where AI ranks your firm.

We'll run these exact questions for your firm across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, and send you a one-page snapshot of where you stand against the names above — free, no obligation.

Get your free 5-prompt check →

Methodology & limitations

We asked 12 fixed questions an SME owner asks before choosing an accounting, corporate-services or audit firm — spanning category ("best accounting firm in Singapore for small businesses"), need (incorporation, corporate secretary, outsourced bookkeeping, audit), persona (startups, e-commerce, foreign-owned), price ("affordable"), one-stop ("incorporation, accounting and corporate secretary"), decision ("how to choose") and reviews.

Each question was put to four AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude — with web access enabled and a Singapore context, in June 2026. That is 48 answers. (Google AI Overviews were folded into the Gemini result as both run on Google's models.) For each answer we recorded every firm named, the lead recommendation, and the sources cited.

On the dollar figures: the lifetime-value model is illustrative, built from publicly indicative SME fee ranges and typical client tenure — not a quote, a benchmark, or a claim about any specific firm's economics. Your real figures will differ; the point is the multiplier, not a precise number.

Limitations: AI answers are non-deterministic and personalised, so this is a single-run snapshot, not a fixed ranking — figures show direction and concentration, not precise league positions, and will shift over time. "Share of voice" counts whether a firm was named anywhere in an answer. This is an independent observation of what AI said when asked; it is not an endorsement, ranking, or assessment of any firm's quality or service. Firm names are reported only where doing so reflects neutral, aggregate findings.